Peer-Review Policy

All manuscripts submitted to AMJS will be subjected to a double-blind peer-review process.

Expert Evaluation: The manuscript will be reviewed by at least two suitable experts in the respective subject area.
Comprehensive Review: Reports from all reviewers will be carefully considered when deciding on the acceptance, revision, or rejection of a manuscript.
Final Authority: The Editor-In-Chief will make the final decision regarding publication, based on the reviewers’ comments.
Editorial Consultation: The Editor-In-Chief may ask one or more advisory board members for their recommendations on a manuscript before making the final decision.
Administrative Oversight: Associate editors and review editors provide essential administrative support to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the peer-review process.
Appeals Process: In the event that authors challenge an editor’s negative decision with valid, scientifically grounded arguments, the manuscript may be sent to an additional reviewer. The final decision will then be made based on their recommendations

Language